A lively exchange on the deteriorating regulatory climate for low electricity users and customer-generators is unfolding in the Stevens Point Journal.
On the eve of this year's Energy Fair, Midwest Renewable Energy Director executive director Nick Hylla kicked off the exchange with a guest column surveying the damaging effects of rate restructuring. Two weeks ago, the Journal published a letter from Mark Meyer, a former PSC Commissioner and the executive director of a utility front group called Fair Rates for Wisconsin's Dairyland (FRWD), In addition to dismissing the MREA as a special interest group, Meyer's letter defended the utilities' rate restructuring proposals and endorsed the solar taxes approved last year by the Public Service Commission. The most recent person to enter the fray is RENEW's Michael Vickerman, who weighed in with a stinging rebuttal to Meyer, which appeared in print a few days ago (see below). Enjoy.
No, rate hikes for solar don't make sense
Letters to the editor
(Photo: File/Gannett Wisconsin Media)
EDITOR: Mark Meyer's recent guest column in the Stevens Point Journal ("Yes, rate hikes for solar make sense") is the latest example of a pro-utility hit piece where the author assails solar energy with conjecture but fails to present any numerical evidence documenting the supposed problem that's got him so excited.
What Meyer didn't convey to the reader is that his organization is a newly formed special interest "front group" funded by monopoly utility companies including Wisconsin Public Service and We Energies. These entrenched utilities have a fully vested interest in bottling up competition from rooftop solar.
When Meyer was a utility regulator, he would have demanded to see the numbers that prove how the costs and benefits of solar energy stack up. Now, as a cheerleader for the state's largest electric utilities, he doesn't have to, preferring instead to toss out specious claims in sentences that begin with "utilities believe" and "they contend."
Unlike Wisconsin, numerous other states, including Vermont, Mississippi and Minnesota, have regulators or state legislatures that insisted on impartial, independent analysis to document the costs and benefits of solar energy generated by electricity customers.
The result: Solar energy has been shown time and again to deliver benefits that equal or exceed the costs to utilities. In some cases it is the solar customers who aren't receiving proper compensation for the benefits they provide to the utility and other customers.
Instead, Wisconsin regulators authorized We Energies, the state's largest monopoly electricity provider and a principal backer of Meyer's group, to levy a hefty tax on customer generation of renewable electricity beginning next year. And what does that penalty look like? As it stands today, that tax would siphon off one-third of a customer's savings from a solar system and redirect it into We Energies' coffers.
As long as Mr. Meyer continues to advance the narrow aims of for-profit monopolies, his professed support for "the expansion of distributed generation" lacks credibility.
The writer is program and policy director of RENEW Wisconsin, online atwww.renewwisconsin.org.